CONVERGENCE AND OPTIMALITY OF ADAPTIVE MIXED METHODS FOR POISSON'S EQUATION IN THE FEEC FRAMEWORK

doi:10.4208/jcm.1905-m2018-0265

Finite Element Exterior Calculus (FEEC) was developed by Arnold, Falk, Winther and others over the last decade to exploit the observation that mixed variational problems can be posed on a Hilbert complex, and Galerkin-type mixed methods can then be obtained by solving finite-dimensional subcomplex problems. Chen, Holst, and Xu (Math. Comp. 78 (2009) 35-53) established convergence and optimality of an adaptive mixed finite element method using Raviart-Thomas or Brezzi-Douglas-Marini elements for Poissonls equation on contractible domains in ${\Bbb R}$², which can be viewed as a boundary problem on the de Rham complex. Recently Demlow and Hirani (Found. Math. Comput. 14 (2014) 1337-1371) developed fundamental tools for a posteriori analysis on the de Rham complex. In this paper, we use tools in FEEC to construct convergence and complexity results on domains with general topology and spatial dimension. In particular, we construct a reliable and efficient error estimator and a sharper quasi-orthogonality result using a novel technique. Without marking for data oscillation, our adaptive method is a contraction with respect to a total error incorporating the error estimator and data oscillation.

Key words: Finite Element Exterior Calculus, Adaptive finite element methods, A posteriori error estimates, Convergence, Quasi-optimality

CLC Number:

[1] M. Ainsworth and J. Oden, A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley& Sons, Inc., 2000.
[2] A. Alonso. Error estimators for a mixed method. Numer. Math., 74:4(1996), 385-395.
[3] D.N. Arnold, R.S. Falk, and R. Winther, Finite element exterior calculus, homological techniques, and applications, Acta Numer., 15(2006), 1-155.
[4] D.N. Arnold, R.S. Falk, and R. Winther, Finite element exterior calculus:from Hodge theory to numerical stability, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 47:2(2010), 281-354.
[28] P. Morin, R.H. Nochetto, and K.G. Siebert, Convergence of adaptive finite element methods, SIAM Rev., 44:4(2002), 631-658(electronic). Revised reprint of "Data oscillation and convergence of adaptive FEM", SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38:2(2000), 466-488.
[29] P. Morin, K.G. Siebert, and A. Veeser, A basic convergence result for conforming adaptive finite elements, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 18:5(2008), 707-737.
[30] J.C. Nédélec, Mixed finite elements in ${\Bbb R}$³, Numer. Math., 35:3(1980), 315-341.
[31] J.C. Nédélec, A new family of mixed finite elements in ${\Bbb R}$³, Numer. Math., 50:1(1986), 57-81.
[32] R.H. Nochetto and A. Veeser, Primer of adaptive finite element methods, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2012, Lecture Notes in Mathematics.
[33] P.A. Raviart and J. Thomas, A mixed finite element method for 2nd order elliptic problems, Springer, Berlin, 1977, Lecture notes in Mathematics 606.
[34] S. Repin, A posteriori estimates for partial differential equations, volume 4 of Radon Series on Computational and Applied Mathematics, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, 2008.
[35] J. Schöberl, A posteriori error estimates for Maxwell equations, Math. Comp., 77:262(2008), 633-649.
[36] R. Stevenson, Optimality of a standard adaptive finite element method, Found. Comput. Math., 7:2(2007), 245-269.
[37] R. Stevenson, The completion of locally refined simplicial partitions created by bisection, Math. Comp., 77:261(2008), 227-241(electronic).
[38] R. Verfürth, A review of a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh refinement tecniques, B. G. Teubner, 1996.
[5] I. Babuška and W.C. Rheinboldt, A posteriori error estimates for the finite element method, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 12(1978), 1597-1615.
[6] I. Babuška and M. Vogelius, Feedback and adaptive finite element solution of one-dimensional boundary value problems, Numer. Math., 44(1984), 75-102.
[7] R. Becker and S. Mao, An optimally convergent adaptive mixed finite element method, Numer. Math., 111(2008), 35-54.
[8] P. Binev, W. Dahmen, and R. DeVore, Adaptive finite element methods with convergence rates, Numer. Math., 97:2(2004), 219-268.
[9] A. Bossavit, Whitney forms:a class of finite elements for three-dimensional computations in electromagnetism, Science, Measurement and Technology, IEE Proceedings A, 135:8(1988), 493500.
[10] F. Brezzi, J. Douglas, and L.D. Marini, Two families of mixed finite elements for second order elliptic problems, Numer. Math., 47:2(1985), 217-235.
[11] J. Brüning and M. Lesch, Hilbert complexes, J. Funct. Anal., 108:1(1992), 88-132.
[12] J.M. Cascon, C. Kreuzer, R.H. Nochetto, and K.G. Siebert, Quasi-optimal convergence rate for an adaptive finite element method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 46:5(2008), 2524-2550.
[13] L. Chen, M. Holst, and J. Xu, Convergence and optimality of adaptive mixed finite element methods, Math. Comp., 78:265(2009), 35-53.
[14] L. Chen and Y. Wu, Convergence of adaptive mixed finite element methods for the Hodge Laplacian equation:without harmonic forms, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 15(2017), 2905-2929.
[15] S.H. Christiansen and R. Winther, Smoothed projections in finite element exterior calculus, Math. Comp., 77:262(2008), 813-829.
[16] A. Demlow, Convergence and quasi-optimality of adaptive finite element methods for harmonic forms, Numer. Math., 136(2017), 941-971.
[17] A. Demlow and A.N. Hirani, A posteriori error estimates for finite element exterior calculus:The de Rham complex, Found. Comput. Math., 14(2014), 1337-1371.
[18] W. Dörfler, A convergent adaptive algorithm for Poisson's equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 33(1996), 1106-1124.
[19] P.W. Gross and P.R. Kotiuga, Electromagnetic theory and computation:a topological approach, volume 48 of Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
[20] M. Holst, A. Mihalik, and R. Szypowski, Convergence and optimality of adaptive methods in the finite element exterior calculus framework, Preprint, Available as http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.1886 arXiv:1306.1886v2[math.NA].
[21] M. Holst and A. Stern, Geometric variational crimes:Hilbert complexes, finite element exterior calculus, and problems on hypersurfaces, Found. Comput. Math., 12:3(2012), 263-293.
[22] M. Holst and A. Stern, Semilinear mixed problems on Hilbert complexes and their numerical approximation, Found. Comput. Math., 12:3(2012), 363-387.
[23] M. Holst, G. Tsogtgerel, and Y. Zhu, Local convergence of adaptive methods for nonlinear partial differential equations, Preprint, Available as http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1382 arXiv:1001.1382[math.NA].
[24] J. Hu and G. Yu, A unified analysis of quasi-optimal convergence for adaptive mixed finite element methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 56:1(2018), 296-316.
[25] J. Huang and Y. Xu, Convergence and complexity of arbitrary order adaptive mixed element methods for the Poisson equation, Sci China Math, 55:5(2012), 1083-1098.
[26] T. Kato, Perturbation theory for linear operators, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 1976, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 132.
[27] Y. Li, Some convergence and optimality results of adaptive mixed methods in finite element exterior calculus, to appear in SIAM J. Numer. Anal., Available as http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.11143 arXiv:1811.11143[math.NA].
[28] P. Morin, R.H. Nochetto, and K.G. Siebert, Convergence of adaptive finite element methods, SIAM Rev., 44:4(2002), 631-658(electronic). Revised reprint of "Data oscillation and convergence of adaptive FEM", SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38:2(2000), 466-488.
[29] P. Morin, K.G. Siebert, and A. Veeser, A basic convergence result for conforming adaptive finite elements, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 18:5(2008), 707-737.
[30] J.C. Nédélec, Mixed finite elements in ${\Bbb R}$³, Numer. Math., 35:3(1980), 315-341.
[31] J.C. Nédélec, A new family of mixed finite elements in ${\Bbb R}$³, Numer. Math., 50:1(1986), 57-81.
[32] R.H. Nochetto and A. Veeser, Primer of adaptive finite element methods, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2012, Lecture Notes in Mathematics.
[33] P.A. Raviart and J. Thomas, A mixed finite element method for 2nd order elliptic problems, Springer, Berlin, 1977, Lecture notes in Mathematics 606.
[34] S. Repin, A posteriori estimates for partial differential equations, volume 4 of Radon Series on Computational and Applied Mathematics, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, 2008.
[35] J. Schöberl, A posteriori error estimates for Maxwell equations, Math. Comp., 77:262(2008), 633-649.
[36] R. Stevenson, Optimality of a standard adaptive finite element method, Found. Comput. Math., 7:2(2007), 245-269.
[37] R. Stevenson, The completion of locally refined simplicial partitions created by bisection, Math. Comp., 77:261(2008), 227-241(electronic).
[38] R. Verfürth, A review of a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh refinement tecniques, B. G. Teubner, 1996.

[1]	Ram Manohar, Rajen Kumar Sinha. ELLIPTIC RECONSTRUCTION AND A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATES FOR FULLY DISCRETE SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEMS [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2022, 40(2): 147-176.
[2]	Xiaoyu Wang, Ya-xiang Yuan. STOCHASTIC TRUST-REGION METHODS WITH TRUST-REGION RADIUS DEPENDING ON PROBABILISTIC MODELS [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2022, 40(2): 294-334.
[3]	Mohammed Harunor Rashid. METRICALLY REGULAR MAPPING AND ITS UTILIZATION TO CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS OF A RESTRICTED INEXACT NEWTON-TYPE METHOD [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2022, 40(1): 44-69.
[4]	Yang Chen, Chunlin Wu. DATA-DRIVEN TIGHT FRAME CONSTRUCTION FOR IMPULSIVE NOISE REMOVAL [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2022, 40(1): 89-107.
[5]	Qianqian Chu, Guanghui Jin, Jihong Shen, Yuanfeng Jin. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF CRANK-NICOLSON SCHEME FOR THE ALLEN-CAHN EQUATION [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(5): 655-665.
[6]	Lu Zhang, Qifeng Zhang, Hai-wei Sun. A FAST COMPACT DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL NONLINEAR SPACE-FRACTIONAL COMPLEX GINZBURG-LANDAU EQUATIONS [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(5): 708-732.
[7]	Xia Cui, Guangwei Yuan, Fei Zhao. ANALYSIS ON A NUMERICAL SCHEME WITH SECOND-ORDER TIME ACCURACY FOR NONLINEAR DIFFUSION EQUATIONS [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(5): 777-800.
[8]	Yong Liu, Chi-Wang Shu, Mengping Zhang. SUB-OPTIMAL CONVERGENCE OF DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS WITH CENTRAL FLUXES FOR LINEAR HYPERBOLIC EQUATIONS WITH EVEN DEGREE POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATIONS [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(4): 518-537.
[9]	Xiaobing Feng, Yukun Li, Yi Zhang. STRONG CONVERGENCE OF A FULLY DISCRETE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR A CLASS OF SEMILINEAR STOCHASTIC PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH MULTIPLICATIVE NOISE [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(4): 574-598.
[10]	Bin Huang, Aiguo Xiao, Gengen Zhang. IMPLICIT-EXPLICIT RUNGE-KUTTA-ROSENBROCK METHODS WITH ERROR ANALYSIS FOR NONLINEAR STIFF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(4): 599-620.
[11]	Yaozong Tang, Qingzhi Yang, Gang Luo. CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS ON SS-HOPM FOR BEC-LIKE NONLINEAR EIGENVALUE PROBLEMS [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(4): 621-632.
[12]	Yuting Chen, Mingyuan Cao, Yueting Yang, Qingdao Huang. AN ADAPTIVE TRUST-REGION METHOD FOR GENERALIZED EIGENVALUES OF SYMMETRIC TENSORS [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(3): 358-374.
[13]	Keke Zhang, Hongwei Liu, Zexian Liu. A NEW ADAPTIVE SUBSPACE MINIMIZATION THREE-TERM CONJUGATE GRADIENT ALGORITHM FOR UNCONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(2): 159-177.
[14]	Huaijun Yang, Dongyang Shi, Qian Liu. SUPERCONVERGENCE ANALYSIS OF LOW ORDER NONCONFORMING MIXED FINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR TIME-DEPENDENT NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(1): 63-80.
[15]	Yongtao Zhou, Chengjian Zhang, Huiru Wang. BOUNDARY VALUE METHODS FOR CAPUTO FRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS [J]. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 2021, 39(1): 108-129.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

CONVERGENCE AND OPTIMALITY OF ADAPTIVE MIXED METHODS FOR POISSON'S EQUATION IN THE FEEC FRAMEWORK

扫码分享